Panos
Athanasopoulos presented the site and our results to a HUGE group of visitors
related to the ‘BRIDGE’ program of the Environment Museum of Stymphalia, the
Historical and Folklore Museum of Corinth.
Around
100 people participated in the tour, and Dr. Simosi, Director of the Ephorate
of Underwater Archaeology; Dr. Mexia, Director of the Historical and Folklore
Museum of Corinth; representative, the Environment Museum of Stymphalia;
representative of the Piraeus Bank; Dr. James
Wright, Director of the American School of Classical Studies, Dr. Papafotiou,
Regional Executive Consultant were present.
THE
DIOLKOS AND THE LOCAL HARBORS:
“Thus the transportation of goods in the two
directions takes place easily, although the initial destinations are far
apart.”
(Strabo, 8, VII, 20 4-5)
Corinth
“on the two seas” had two large harbors at its disposal, one on each gulf,
Lechaion on the Corinthian and Kenchreae on the Saronic, as well as a small
harbor Schoinous, at the exit of the Diolkos on the Saronic
Gulf. It is logical to suppose that they were built in about the
same epoch, on the basis of a single unified plan which besides the easy and
safe transport of goods, also provided wealth to Corinth. This is what Strabo so aptly states
in his work on geography.
1)”For it was desirable for the merchants of both
Italy and Asia to avoid the voyage around Cape Maleas and to unload their
cargoes in Corinth, as well as the duties on the merchants entering and leaving
the Peloponnese, which fell to those who had the keys”.
(Strabo 8, VII, 20, 10-12)
2)”Corinth
now is said to be rich from trade, lies on the Isthmus and has two harbors. The
one which is closer [gives access to] Asia and the other to Italy”.
(Strabo 8, VII, 20, 10-12)
On the Corinthian Gulf,
a harbor did not develop at the end of the Diolkos, as happened with Schoinous
on the Saronic, because Lechaeum, which was close to the west end, was on the
course of the ships and provided for all the needs of the voyage. On the other
gulf, the harbor of Kenchreae was off the route of the voyage to Peiraeus
and Athens, so that there was seen to be a need
for building the harbor
of Schoinous
Lechaeum:
“Since today we see in many countries and cities ports
and harbors cleverly situated near the city, so that they lie neither very
close nor too far from it, but are enclosed with the city by walls and other
such fortifications…”
(Aristotle, Politics 1327a, 31-36 or §1327a)
Lechaeum
was the big harbor of Corinth on the Corinthian Gulf.
It consisted chiefly of a port, with very extensive harbor installations, but
without the development of an independent settlement for dwelling.
Two
separate harbors, an inner and an outer one, can be discerned here.
The
inner harbor was a characteristic example of the “kothón” [“goblet”, “bottle”,
“jug”, ”tumbler”] type. The mouth of an older, pre-existing stream had been dug
out, and corresponding paired basins created. Then these basins were connected to
the sea and constituted the inner harbor, which had a surface of about 100
stremmata [100,00m³] and was encircled by quays all around the basins. The
total length was up to about 4km.
The
outer harbor had been built on the sea, with engineering structures both
parallel and perpendicular to the shore, such as breakwaters, jetties and
moles. It was one of the largest harbors of the ancient world. It was repaired
and rebuilt many times. It was connected with Corinth, protected by the Long Walls and by
intermediate fortification. The Long Walls began from the harbor and extended
to the city’s circumvallation, forming a single unified fortification.
In
whatever epoch the construction took place in this area, the variously
developed techniques and measures were adapted. Thus in the Archaїc and
Classical epochs, the harbor works were built with natural blocks of large
size, set on vertical posts or piles, which were not interlinked. In the Roman
epoch artificial blocks (onkolithoi:concrete) were used; these were made up of
small and medium stones and hydraulic [waterproof] cement in successive layers.
The hydraulic cement was a bonding mixture of Theran or volcanic earth (tufa,
tuff), lime and a small amount of water.
The stones were placed in wooden
frames with the desired dimensions. They were surrounded by liquid hydraulic
cement, which cured and hardened in the sea, so that composite stone blocks of
large size were finally produced. This technique was adapted to the places in
which we are interested here, and the various breakwaters, quays, moles, etc
were thus built. This harbor was in operation for many centuries, facilitating
trade with the West. Parts of this so-called outer harbor were still in use in
the 15th century AD.
It is a quote from the book of Apostolos E. Papafotiou
"THE DIOLKOS ON THE ISTHMUS OF CORINTH" (2006).
Dr. Apostolos E. Papafotiou
Regional Councillor of Peloponnese in charge of International Affairs and European Programmes
Civil Engineer
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου